|
貴州省翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：The last 20 years, China's economic growth in the world is a miracle, but basically no Chinese farmers not only to benefit from this process, but also further widened the gap with the modern sector. From around 1985 to the present, the living conditions of farmers did not fundamentally changed, even significant changes are hard to tell. Can be said that the changes in China 20 years, depriving farmers of income are based on the premise right. This is a must attach great importance to the problem.
Unfortunately, so far, or whether it is the economists, not the Chinese clearly understand the fundamental problems of agriculture. It can be predicted, if not stop the denial of the right of farm income, the so-called modernization of Chinese society, it will go the other direction, China will gradually toward two Chinese, namely, urban China and rural China, the so-called harmonious society simply impossible. So I think, not only refers to a harmonious society, city, community or public order problems are not limited to environmental protection, harmonious society in China's biggest problems, from the village, this is a can not be ignored and must be addressed.
I think the solution to the problem has the following two ways: First, the issue of land ownership, must be resolutely abolished the land requisition system and farmland protection system, the real implementation of the collective ownership of land. We know that the current practice of collective ownership of land is actually a disguised form of state-owned system, when the government should establish an economic development or to build a road when no one dared to confront the mayor and the village, farmers more no right to speak up. So we do not there is a true collective ownership of land to be executed. Our Constitution has a clear collective land ownership provisions, need to do is to really implement the collective, while the real implementation of the collective ownership of land when the land is owned by the township and village all the time, farmers must establish a voting system, by the farmers themselves decided within the geographical scope of this group, is holding the land in the form of collective, or willing to be assigned to each village land per household. Put option to the peasants, not by the mayor, the mayor or the mayor to make decisions, not by the economists and the city people to determine the land should be owned by peasant collectives or individuals. In fact because of China's landscape features, agricultural production, farming and the huge economic differences in external conditions, may be implemented in a region conducive to collective land ownership for farmers, while in another area, the land to individual farmers to make more benefit.
|