|
貴陽翻譯公司關鍵字：Comes to agricultural issues, the current economy, whether domestic or overseas academic advisory body to China's agricultural policy recommendations, many from the start of land ownership, given the proposal is relatively simple, it is the implementation of land privatization, as China agriculture out of the current predicament of the main program. I am holding a different view.
In my opinion, agricultural land ownership issue is not currently a priority of China's agriculture. There are two reasons: First, from a more classical sense, our domestic economic circles that should move towards privatization of agricultural land, often from this point of view to increase agricultural productivity to think that in agricultural production, especially agricultural production and farming directly linked to ownership of the land under conditions that can scale to improve the efficiency of agricultural production, on this basis, farmers can become an independent business unit, in agricultural production, property rights have a more independent position. This view is the lack of factual basis. I have a basic judgments from experience: agricultural production, especially the efficiency of agricultural production with agricultural farming land status and ownership of the property has little, from the classical sense, I consider any changes to ownership of land, usually disrupt an already stabilized agricultural farming systems, to bring damaging productivity.A typical example is land reform. Land reform is a very interesting process of land privatization, although logically the land confiscated by the feudal landlords, and then distributed to the farmers, but the middle is actually a transition state, this transition state contains an unstable state ownership the state. The first is the country with a powerful way to obtain the landlord's land, then in a very brief moment of national ownership of the land, then countries then land to the peasants. A large number of facts have proven that the land privatization process, was greatly damaged agricultural production. Therefore, the academic title held by the same economic efficiency of the direct view of the environment at large should be said is correct, but does not apply to China's agriculture.
I think that depends on the efficiency of agricultural farming in organizational management. If the organization is a collective farming system management, and that the efficiency of certain agricultural low; if this is a household-based farming to start, and that efficiency is full of. Several decades has proven, state-owned or collectively owned land under the conditions, can still create a kind of farmer-based management responsibility, under the conditions in the efficiency of agricultural production has reached its full of the. In other words, advocates of land assigned to households now, I think it has to improve agricultural productivity and there is no greater role.
The second reason, scholars believe that the implementation of the privatization of land, farmers may receive a separate property, as has this property, farmers have an exchange with the city and the modern sector of the system, resulting in the gradual improvement of the process rural production sector efficiency. This view is basically a paper, it is based on Lewis's dual economy model, and this model through the test of practice in China is basically a failure. Failure model is not wrong, but the situation in China with foreign countries is completely different. Lewis model refers to the natural economy and the market economy conditions, the so-called a backward country and economic sector gradually transformed into a modern state and modern sectors of the economy in the process, this process is a natural right of return exists, there is a strong independent external deprived of the benefits of the right, while in China from the 1950s when, through the purchase and sale of agricultural products and export control, farmers have been deprived of the right of return, so the Lewis model is not applicable in China completely. So far, China economist for the overall recommendations for Chinese Agricultural Policy, or the shadow behind the Lewis model.
|