|
鐵嶺翻譯公司關鍵字：Because the purpose of capitalist commodity production is to extract surplus value, if there is no residual value, profit, commodity production can not continue, can not exist. Conversely, as long as there is production of goods and commodities, there will be labor exploitation, there will be social and economic injustice. So to eliminate exploitation and social and economic injustice, we must eliminate the production of goods and commodities.
Since the goods and the elimination of commodity production, the economic form of social and economic implementation of the product, it means that the social and economic means of regulation is the "plan." Because the product does not exist, the market, that market regulation, it does not exist, leaving only planned adjustment.
Therefore, the product form of the socialist planned economy, Marx's labor theory of value theory is the inevitable result of the request - no matter whether inside the original Marxist socialist economy had given the "planned economy" is defined.
Many commentators (including the above-mentioned Mr. Fan Gang) that the "planned economy" Stalin, the Soviet textbooks "masterpiece." And this is only their good wishes nothing more. Because they do not want to see their "saints" and "Bible" for errors - if not because of poor knowledge of their own words.
In addition, the labor theory of value of the other theories, I do not see the explanation or interpretation of Soviet textbooks have any fundamental error, I only see that Marx's labor theory of value is almost completely wrong theory.
Marxist political economy is the foundation and backbone of Marxist labor theory of value. Marx's labor theory of value for the error, I am in the "labor theory of value on a correct understanding of the fundamental obstacles", "new value problem solution" and "Marxist labor theory of error" and the text has a more profound analysis, that is not here repeat, only a brief (of course, there are a considerable number of scholars raised doubts on the Marxist labor theory of value, but they did not see the point of Marx's labor theory of value fatal).
First, Marx's labor theory of value creation and value of goods determined by the theory is completely wrong.Value of the goods, that is, exchange value, the exchange relations between the different commodities or exchange ratio, it is not a real, tangible things, like objects in the same proportion, there is no creation does not create problems. In fact, we are creating wealth, rather than create value. But value is also used to measure the amount of wealth as a measure of wealth. But not the same as the value of wealth, value and wealth are two different concepts. We tend to confuse the two. We know that "labor is the father of wealth, land is the mother of wealth." Labor is not the only source of wealth. In fact, all productive factors (ie resources) are the wealth creators.
The value of labor is not the only factor, not even a separate value factors. Determinants of value of the goods there are two, one is the possession of a useful nature. Magnitude of value of goods from the possession of goods and two factors determine the usefulness. Labor (labor cost) is only possession of a special and general form only, not the possession of all. Therefore, it is not an independent value of the factor, but not the only value factor.
Second, the theory of surplus value is wrong.
|