|
邢臺(tái)翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：In fact, the urban economic專業(yè)翻譯公司服務(wù)最好的 system reform, as far as the success of rural reform, urban reform to the state department of revenue employee benefits significantly improve the opportunity, but did not change the efficiency of the state sector in the social life and its monopoly position. It is this asymmetry of the city's economic專業(yè)翻譯公司服務(wù)最好的 reforms, leading to the state sector's contribution to economic專業(yè)翻譯公司服務(wù)最好的 growth less, and occupy more than economic專業(yè)翻譯公司服務(wù)最好的 resources, and ultimately inhibit the growth of rural residents' income, resulting in rural-urban income disparities. If the state sector, the distribution of income being the same as rural, largely by the market mechanism, rather than relying on state-provided monopoly of all the opportunities and benefits, then, in the state sector profits shrink, a sharp increase in debt, the urban residents income may not only increase, and may even decline, urban-rural income gap will not widen.
China's agricultural management and the scholars have long for the urban-rural income gap a warning, the news media often reported, but the urban-rural income gap did not stop this trend, the state sector "learn" the process of rural resources is also still business專業(yè)英語(yǔ)翻譯公司科技文件翻譯哪里最好 as usual. For example, in 1994, in order to prevent agricultural production, the government政府許可的定點(diǎn)正規(guī)翻譯公司 increased the price of agricultural products, however, prices of agricultural products to improve the benefits to farmers, but also by the state sector through agricultural and industrial production, consumer prices rose away, the result of farmers' get "and" loss "offset, the net was the same. [22] a similar scenario is repeated again and again. Again, serious inflation in China in 1995, the city government政府許可的定點(diǎn)正規(guī)翻譯公司 to restore to the retail price subsidies, with a "visible hand" of market mechanisms to hold the "invisible hand" in order to suppress the city prices; resulting in high-income urban prices cheap, the price of medium-sized cities has become a "basin" in the low-income rural areas, the price increase but price rises above the city of about 5 percentage points. [23]Clearly, low-income farmers may be hurt more by inflation, and why China's anti-inflation measures do not protect farmers, but mainly to protect the high-income urban residents, "the more rich the more relief"? This major high-income urban dwellers and "eat relief" phenomenon, very common in the former socialist countries. Before the reform, Moscow, Leningrad, East Berlin and other cities are the most abundant supply of goods the country有資質(zhì)的正規(guī)翻譯公司哪個(gè)好, the most favorable living conditions, state subsidies up to the city. In fact, China is still repeating the Soviet Union, East Germany's old, the city invested a large amount of price subsidies, not because more urban residents than rural residents the need for government政府許可的定點(diǎn)正規(guī)翻譯公司 financial assistance, but because of dissatisfaction with urban residents than rural residents may be dissatisfaction with the political threat more.
Urban-rural income gap is bound to the performance for the rural people's consumption capacity, decreased ability to save. The smallest in the urban-rural income gap in 1985, accounting for 80% of the population of rural residents to buy the consumer goods market, 40% of the goods, the rest are purchased by urban residents. Since then, with the widening income gap between urban and rural areas, rural residents and gradually shrinking the share of consumption, by 1998, this proportion dropped to 26% [24]. Savings in the year the country有資質(zhì)的正規(guī)翻譯公司哪個(gè)好's inhabitants, but also rural residents in 1985 accounted for 1 / 3; and 1995, dropped to only 17% [25]. This corresponds to the number of rural residents is relatively self-built housing contraction in 1985, their self-built housing for investment in fixed assets investment accounts for about 1 / 5, while in 1995 this dropped to 1 / 10 [26] . Low-income rural residents, lack of savings, limiting their own ability to reinvest in operations, resulting in slow growth of rural economy, agricultural production fell.
|