|
石河子翻譯公司關鍵字：Volkswagen brand, and second, because we specified the balance due, although the month for a little less, but also the total amount is higher than conventional loans, and can not be early repayment. In this regard, the consumer issued a "car loan, you say love is not easy," sighs the People's Republic of Road Traffic Safety Law "(hereinafter referred to as" SGX-ST Act ") on May 1, 2004 an official in the national implementation but the "SGX-ST Act" caused controversy is unprecedented. The focus of controversy focused on the Article 76: the "motor vehicle traffic accidents resulting in personal injury, property damage, the insurance companies in compulsory third party liability insurance, within the limits of liability for compensation. More than part of the limits of liability , liability follows:(1) motor vehicle traffic accidents between, by the responsible party at fault; both sides are at fault, according to their percentage of fault shared responsibility.2) motor vehicles and non-motor vehicle drivers, traffic accidents between pedestrians from motor vehicle shall bear the responsibility; However, there is evidence that non-motor vehicle drivers, pedestrians violating traffic safety laws, regulations, motor vehicle driving people have taken the necessary measures to deal with, and to reduce motor vehicle liability side. The loss of traffic from non-motor vehicle drivers, pedestrians deliberately caused motor vehicle shall not be liable. "I believe that," SGX law "people-oriented principle of legislation is good, but its implementation is rushed. One did not keep up with supporting measures, such as mentioned in Article 76 of the" motor vehicle traffic accidents causing personal casualties, property damage, the insurance companies in compulsory third party liability insurance liability within the limits of compensation. "And China has not yet compulsory third party liability insurance, vehicle owners who are buying now are the third party liability insurance, the principles it claims is a" fault "principle that the insured responsible for the accident, the insurance company according to the proportion of responsibility within the limits of insurance compensation; fault insured or exceed the proportion of no-fault compensation, the insurance company refused the claim so that the owner could face their own law but subject to significant
|